The University guidelines state that ‘students must be the authors of their own work. Content produced with generative AI platforms, such as ChatGPT, without an approved method of declaration and/or prior academic approval, does not represent the student’s own original work so could be considered a form of academic misconduct.
For full details on the University's guidelines on unacceptable practices see the USW AI policy document.
Note: Guidance on the use of AI is continually changing to reflect developments in the field - please check this page regularly for updates.
(last updated 10.10.23)
If the AI’s end product (for example use of ChatGPT in conversation) is only available to you, cite this as a personal communication and include a description of the AI generated material in your in-text citation. Consult your tutor in case they require you to provide a copy of the AI work as an appendix to your work.
Citation Order:
|
Reference Example
Example In-text citation A copy of this response is in Appendix 1. |
If you have used an AI tool to generate an image you must acknowledge that tool as a source.
Citation order
|
Reference list
Example in-text citation |
Figure 3. A cat reading a book in a field of daisies image generated using an AI tool (Craiyon, 14 July 2023)